#PrivChat Topics for 5.22 Debrief on #pii2012 with @jim_adler and @brendan_charles

 By Shaun Dakin, Founder of Privacy Camp and #PrivChat

This past Monday through Wednesday was the 2012 privacy identity innovation conference in Seattle.    Privacy Camp was proud to sponsor the event.

So, this upcoming PrivChat will be a de-brief from two participants at the event.  Jim Adler is the CPO of Intelius and a regular PrivChat guest and participant.   He is also a regular contributor to this blog.

Brendan Charles is also a #PrivChat regular and the Community Manager at the Canadian social network Hibe.com

I asked them to send me some of their top line take aways from the conference and we'll use them as a basis for discussion during #PrivChat this coming Tuesday May 22nd, 2012.

SO !

Please read these topics and ideas and vote on your top 2 / 3 in the comments below to let us know what you really want to discuss.

From Brendan:

 

Q1: Privacy Policies don't communicate privacy to users, they avoid litigation. Alternatives?

Q2: Just because we can, should we? Location tracking and the retail experience. See http://euclidelements.com/ andhttp://www.pointinside.com/
Q3: Increasing Transparency for Consumers- How do we empower users in the bargaining process for their data?
Q4: The 'creepy' factor: How do you define it? what lines don't you cross? See: https://twitter.com/#!/search/realtime/%23pii2012%20creepy
Some other big discussions:
  • Digital Death
  • Accountability vs. Anonymity
  • Digital Citizenship and Responsibility
  • Should there be Federal/International definitions of PII (personal identifiable information)?
  • Big Data vs. Small Data
From Jim:
  1. How can the the non-technie and non-lawyer (e.g., philosopher, economist, sociologist) have a larger voice in the privacy debate?
  2. Is PII dead? See http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/227211-ftc-shifts-its-approach-to-protecting-online-privacy

 

Great Presentation > @randypicker: talk tomorrow is "Structuring Competition in #Privacy "

Click here to download:
PickerGMUPrivacyTalk.pptx (6.99 MB)
(download)

--
> Onward,

Shaun Dakin
Dakin & Associates Consulting 


Email Address > Click here
☎ 703.829.0854 (Cell)


Winner:  Mashable.com Open Web Award

Book a Meeting / Online Calendar - http://tgl.me/ShaunDakin


Social: Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Tungle.me StumbleUpon Flavors.me foursquare Google Plus Klout pinterest
Contact me: Skype dakinshaun
Twitter Latest tweet: Just interviewed by the New York Times on Robocalls ! (we'll see if there is a quote or not!) #robocalls

#PrivChat topics for 5.15 with @aarontitus CPO of Identity Finder #privacy #EHR #SSN #Linkedin

Shaun Dakin, Founder Privacy Camp and #PrivChat


This week we are lucky to have with us the Chief Privacy Officer of Identity Finder, Aaron Titus.  


Aaron was part of the team that created the first Privacy Camp in Washington, DC in 2009.


Aaron's full bio is here.


Aaron Titus is the Vice President of Business Development and Chief Privacy Officer for Identity Finder, and an attorney specializing in Internet, Technology and Privacy law. Aaron has spent four years as the Privacy Fellow for the Washington DC policy institute Liberty Coalition. There he helped develop Privacy Commons: An emerging framework for creating complete, informative, enforceable, and easy to adopt privacy policies. He also developed NationalIDWatch.org, empowering individuals to recover from identity breach and theft. As an attorney he has consulted organizations on legal requirements, risk identification, risk management, and developing a corporate culture of privacy. Aaron Titus’ work has been covered in countless newspapers and news media outlets, including the Washington Post, New York Times, Forbes, the Wall Street Journal, The Associated Press, ABC, MSNBC, (and NPR’s Wait Wait Don’t Tell Me). In May 2010 he testified before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs. Aaron Titus received his J.D. from the George Washington School of Law, and his undergraduate degree in Architecture from the University of Utah.


Identity Finder's website is here.



Outlook & LinkedIn Social Connector: LinkedIn automatically accesses and uploads all of Outlook contacts, with no way to opt out, if the user has installed Outlook’s Social Connector (a default in some installations).  LinkedIn’s help desk confirms that the only way to stop LinkedIn from automatically uploading a user’s entire contact list is to uninstall Social Connector, which may have unintended consequences.  LinkedIn’s privacy policy makes no mention of this issue.  What other companies have an express agreement to share users’ contact databases, and does it matter that Microsoft shares user information stored on a local hard drive vs. its cloud?

 

SSNs on Form 990 Tax Returns: Identity Finder recently published a study of 3 million public tax returns filed by non-profit organizations, and found nearly 475,000 social security numbers of accountants, scholarship recipients, directors, employees and donors (http://www.identityfinder.com/us/business/lookup990).  In response to our report, the IRS claims that they do not have the legal authority to redact the information (http://www.accountingtoday.com/news/IRS-Warns-Nonprofits-Tax-Exempt-Social-Security-Numbers-62400-1.html).   To what extent is PII on public government documents a problem? Who, if anybody, should be responsible to clean it up? What rights should individuals have to redact public documents to protect identity and privacy?

 

EHRs and Federated Identities: Do Electronic Health Records and federated identities make us safer? Is technology privacy agnostic? Does the inefficiency imposed by paper records actually improve health information privacy?

 

The Market for Privacy: Over the past few years, I have come to the unhappy conclusion that aside from a few niche exceptions, the free market generally disfavors privacy and privacy innovation.  I have been searching for fundamental market forces that favor privacy, or evidence that such forces exist.  What market forces favor privacy?  What (if any) major moneyed/corporate interests favor privacy? Are there any examples of privacy-enhancing technologies that have found widespread, viral (read: NOT niche) acceptance?


--
> Onward,

Shaun Dakin
Dakin & Associates Consulting 


Email Address > Click here
☎ 703.829.0854 (Cell)


Winner:  Mashable.com Open Web Award

Book a Meeting / Online Calendar - http://tgl.me/ShaunDakin


Social: Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Tungle.me StumbleUpon Flavors.me foursquare Google Plus Klout pinterest
Contact me: Skype dakinshaun
Twitter Latest tweet: #Privacy Daily is out! http://t.co/IBl6J21v ▸ Top stories today via @mt_take_action @odeleeuw @dotdotdotdash

Cookies by Facebook #Privacy #Privchat

Click here to download:
Facebook Cookies.pdf (96 KB)
(download)

--
> Onward,

Shaun Dakin
Dakin & Associates Consulting 


Email Address > Click here
☎ 703.829.0854 (Cell)


Winner:  Mashable.com Open Web Award

Book a Meeting / Online Calendar - http://tgl.me/ShaunDakin


Social: Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Tungle.me StumbleUpon Flavors.me foursquare Google Plus Klout pinterest
Contact me: Skype dakinshaun
Twitter Latest tweet: Facebook Privacy Policy Change Paves Way For Off-Facebook Advertising - Forbes http://t.co/NFRXlkBe

Monday > Government Online #Privacy Series w/FTC to Feature Expert Private Sector Privacy Panel


The Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee cordially invites you to …

New Internet Privacy Legislation: What the White House, Federal Trade Commission and the European Commission Are Recommending.


A Two Part Briefing Featuring FTC Official Maneesha Mithal [bio] on the FTC's Internet Privacy recommendations to Congress followed by a private sector panel reacting to Internet legislative proposals from Europe, the White House and the FTC.

Monday, May 14, 2012
12:00 pm - 1:30 pm, Luncheon Presentation and Q&A
Rayburn House Office Building - Room 2226
Please RSVP to rsvp@netcaucus.org or via phone to 202-407-8829
For More Information, Click Here

Join us for our third and final briefing as part of our 2012 Government Privacy Series:

New Internet Privacy Legislation: What the White House, Federal Trade Commission and the European Commission Are Recommending.

The Federal Trade Commission called on Congress to pass new Internet privacy laws in its Privacy Framework Report released in March. FTC official Maneesha Mithal, Associate Director of the Division of Privacy and Identity Protection, Federal Trade Commission (FTC), will start this briefing off with the FTC's recommendations -- the last of the three governmental Internet privacy initiatives in this series.

Following Ms. Mithal, we've assembled a private sector panel of experts to review all three legislative proposals from the FTC, the Obama Administration's “Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights” white paper and the proposed "European Data Protection Regulation" respectively.

Panelists:

  • Justin Brookman, Director, Project on Consumer Privacy - Center for Democracy & Technology [bio]
  • Steve DelBianco, Executive Director - NetChoice [bio]
  • Rachel Thomas, Vice President, Government Affairs - Direct Marketing Association [bio]
  • Peter Swire, Professor of Law, Ohio State University [bio]
  • Christopher Wolf, Partner - Hogan Lovells [bio] (Moderator)

The Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee previously hosted a briefing by Françoise Le Bail, European Commission, Director General for Justice on the recently unveiled draft European Data Protection Regulation. Just a few weeks ago we hosted the second briefing featuring Daniel J. Weitzner, Deputy Chief Technology Officer for Internet Policy in the White House to discuss The White House Proposal For A Framework for Protecting Privacy: "Consumer Data Privacy in a Networked World". The briefing by Ms. Mithal on the FTC's Internet privacy proposal is the last in this three part series.

The White House Report represented a comprehensive blueprint to address consumer privacy and give users more control over how personal information is used. This proposal included an Administration call for Congress to write these principles into legislation in several key areas, and also provided guidance for the Commerce Department to engage in a multi-stakeholder process with companies that use personal data and privacy advocates, in order to develop and implement privacy policies, enforceable by the Federal Trade Commission. In part, the Administration's efforts are designed to move US Privacy regulations into closer alignment with those of the EU and other international trading partners. This is a significant proposal from the Administration and we encourage all technology policy staff to attend.


What: New Internet Privacy Legislation: What the White House, Federal Trade Commission and the European Commission Are Recommending (A Two Part Briefing)
Date: Monday, May 14, 2012
Time: Program begins promptly at 12:00 pm, check-in starts at 11:30 am. (Box lunch will be served)
Location Rayburn House Office Building - Room 2226
RSVP: Space is limited. Please RSVP to rsvp@netcaucus.org or via phone to 202-407-8829. Note: Registration is complimentary.

This widely attended educational briefing is hosted by the Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee (ICAC), part of a 501 (c)(3) charitable organization. Congressional staff and members of the press welcome. The ICAC is a private sector organization comprised of public interest groups, trade associations, non-profits, and corporations. More information on the ICAC is available at www.netcaucus.org.


Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee
1634 I Street NW - Washington, DC 20006
www.NetCaucus.org
Find us on Facebook, Twitter & Google+

Privacy: A Transatlantic Culture Clash

The difference between European and American privacy is typically framed as E.U. aspiration versus U.S. pragmatism:

  • The E.U. views privacy as a source "right of personality" versus the U.S. mosaic of privacy torts;
  • the E.U. has comprehensive, federal law versus U.S. spotty, sectoral statutes; and
  • the E.U. has spotty enforcement at the nation-state level versus U.S. rigorous enforcement through private right of action, state enforcement through attorneys general, and federal regulation through the Federal Trade Commission.

As Don Cohn has said, "hell on earth is E.U. law and U.S. enforcement." There's some truth to these characterizations, but they miss the point.

Read the rest at JimAdler.me →

#Privchat 5.8.12 Topics are now available #CISPA #Facebook #Privacy #FBI >

Thanks to everyone !

Shaun and Amie

This week's contributors:

@GetAbine @clarinette01 @KateMilberry @jonneiditz @tynanwrites
@GarrettCobarr @PrivacyCamp @dontmineonme @SafeShepherd
@alexanderhanff @lmbrownlee1 @cranstone @priveazy @logicallib
@amess @tagmanprivacy @GetCocoon @ConstellationRG @csub8 @PogoWasRight
@Brendan_Charles @Ghostery @Thumbpr @CANARYorg @IsCool @rwang0
@k8ethics @BrockMeeks @danielg280 @PrivacyDigest @m2sys @ProjBreadcrumbs
@jacaldwell @flugennock @cranstone @PaulbernalUK @Privacymatters

Will More Companies Follow Mozilla Down the Path Away from CISPA?
Forbes: Mozilla Slams CISPA, Breaking Silicon Valley's Silence On Cybersecurity Bill     http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2012/05/01/mozilla-slams-cispa-breaking-silicon-valleys-silence-on-cybersecurity-bill/

What Makes Facebook Worth it?
Washington Post: Facebook IPO: How could privacy concerns affect revenue?     http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/facebook-ipo-how-could-privacy-concerns-affect-revenue/2012/05/04/gIQAX8kA1T_story.html?wprss=rss_technology
Forbes: Why Facebook Stock Makes The Best Graduation Present Possible     http://www.forbes.com/sites/abrambrown/2012/05/07/why-facebook-stock-is-the-best-graduation-present-possible/

Privacy Bill of Rights: What Will Happen in the Senate?
The Hill: Senate to examine Obama plan for online privacy ‘bill of rights’     http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/224965-senate-to-examine-obama-administrations-privacy-bill-of-rights

Should the Government get a Back Door? Can It Be Stopped?
CNET: FBI: We need wiretap-ready Web sites - now     http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57428067-83/fbi-we-need-wiretap-ready-web-sites-now/?tag=postrtcol;mostPop


--
> Onward,

Shaun Dakin
Dakin & Associates Consulting 


Email Address > Click here
☎ 703.829.0854 (Cell)


Winner:  Mashable.com Open Web Award

Book a Meeting / Online Calendar - http://tgl.me/ShaunDakin


Social: Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Tungle.me StumbleUpon Flavors.me foursquare Google Plus Klout pinterest
Contact me: Skype dakinshaun

Why Employees (need to) Lie

I've had the great fortune to have amazingly talented and hard-working people work for me over the years. The talent always comes with a high degree of honesty and integrity. Honesty isn't just the right thing to do; it's the basis for all healthy human relationships.

In business, honesty builds strong professional networks, streamlines team-solving of tough problems, and is just easier than juggling lies. So I'm disappointed when a member of my team feels the need to be less than honest.

To get more granular on this, consider the tough case where an employee is looking for another job. To cover his tracks when interviewing, he tells me he's sick or has a doctor appointment. For an active job search, that's a lot of sick days and doctor appointments. I find myself wanting to send flowers. Why does he choose to undermine our relationship by lying to me?

Well, I've figured it out. It's all my fault. Read the rest at JimAdler.me →

#PrivChat Topics for 4.17 with JIm Brock CEO and Founder at @PrivacyChoice #Privacy #DNTrack

Shaun Dakin, founder Privacy Camp and #PrivChat

We are pleased to have as our guest 4.17 JIm Brock CEO and Founder at Privacy Choice and Privacy Score.

If you have questions for Jim, please use the comment box below.

Topics are:
  1. Will the ad-icon program be necessary after Do Not Track is generally adopted?
  2. Will the availability of Do Not Track loosen restrictions on aggressive tracking methods, like device fingerprinting?
  3. Should tracking companies submit to audits and what would those look like?
  4. Does Facebook have a responsibility to police its app universe?